11. November 2008
Horse s…
PJ O’Rourke bringt die Hintergründe der Finanzkrise in einem wunderbaren Artikel über das Versagen (nicht nur) der amerikanischen Konservativen wie immer auf den Punkt:
Under constant political pressure, which went almost unresisted by conservatives, a lot of lousy mortgages that would never be repaid were handed out to Jim Jerk and his drinking buddies and all the ex-wives and single mothers with whom Jim and his pals have littered the nation.
Wall Street looked at the worthless paper and thought, “How can we make a buck off this?” The answer was to wrap it in a bow. Take a wide enough variety of lousy mortgages–some from the East, some from the West, some from the cities, some from the suburbs, some from shacks, some from McMansions–bundle them together and put pressure on the bond rating agencies to do fancy risk management math, and you get a “collateralized debt obligation” with a triple-A rating. Good as cash. Until it wasn’t.
Or, put another way, Wall Street was pulling the “room full of horse s–” trick. Brokerages were saying, “We’re going to sell you a room full of horse s–. And with that much horse s–, you just know there’s a pony in there somewhere.”
Anyway, it’s no use blaming Wall Street. Blaming Wall Street for being greedy is like scolding defensive linemen for being big and aggressive. The people on Wall Street never claimed to be public servants. They took no oath of office. They’re in it for the money. We pay them to be in it for the money. We don’t want our retirement accounts to get a 2 percent return. (Although that sounds pretty good at the moment.)
What will destroy our country and us is not the financial crisis but the fact that liberals think the free market is some kind of sect or cult, which conservatives have asked Americans to take on faith. That’s not what the free market is. The free market is just a measurement, a device to tell us what people are willing to pay for any given thing at any given moment. The free market is a bathroom scale. You may hate what you see when you step on the scale. “Jeeze, 230 pounds!” But you can’t pass a law making yourself weigh 185. Liberals think you can. And voters–all the voters, right up to the tippy-top corner office of Goldman Sachs–think so too.
We, the conservatives, who do understand the free market, had the responsibility to–as it were–foreclose upon this mess. The market is a measurement, but that measuring does not work to the advantage of a nation or its citizens unless the assessments of volume, circumference, and weight are conducted with transparency and under the rule of law. We’ve had the rule of law largely in our hands since 1980. Where is the transparency? It’s one more job we botched.
Verfasst von SteffenH um 15:00 Uhr in der Kategorie Grundsatzfragen, Humor und Satire, International, Politik (Trackback)
Ein Problem ist wohl auch die Verzerrung relativer Preise, weil die Preisanpassung der Inflationsrate bei den Gütern nicht immer gleichzeitig vorgenommen werden kann. Das äußert sich dann in einer schlechteren Bewertbarkeit von Unternehmen anhand von geschäftsberichten etc., mit der Folge, dass die Leute weniger Aktien, dafür aber mehr in vermeintlich wertsichere Anlagen wie Gold oder Immobilien investieren (hier könnte ein Link zur Finanzkrise bestehen). In manchen Ländern sind auch die Kapitalertragssteuern nicht mit einem Inflationsindex versehen, was Investitionen in Unternehmen auch weniger attraktiv macht.
